Journal
POLICY AND PRACTICE IN HEALTH AND SAFETY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 131-144Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14773996.2017.1348571
Keywords
Risk matrix; risk assessments; uncertainty; risk analysis; ISO31000 (2009)
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The consequence/likelihood risk matrix is a widely used risk analysis and reporting technique, often incorporated into risk and safety management software, and often relied on to help make decisions about the tolerability of risk. However, decision makers may not be aware of matrix design features that give rise to uncertainty, or of errors in its use causing further uncertainty. This paper builds on prior evidence to argue that poorly designed or inappropriately used risk matrices result in an increase in uncertainty and, potentially, adverse effects on people and organizational objectives. It is further argued that risk matrices should be designed for reporting as part of an overall risk assessment, and not used on their own. The evidence is reframed as a goal tree to show where design and use of the matrix might reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty in risk assessments. Suggestions are given for reducing uncertainty in the design and use of risk matrices that may enable more effective risk assessments. The article concludes that (1) risk assessors need better training in risk matrix design and use, and (2) decision makers need training to better understand the inherent unreliability of any risk matrix as a decision support technique.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available