Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 823-853Publisher
IGITUR, UTRECHT PUBLISHING & ARCHIVING SERVICES
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.758
Keywords
Collaboration; governance systems; public policy; rules-in-use; sustainable development; top-down approaches.
Categories
Funding
- Quebec Center for Biodiversity Science (QCBS)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada
- Fonds de recherche sur la societe et la culture (FQRSC) [138254]
- Sustainable Agriculture Scholarship, McGill University
- NSERC Northern Research Chairs program
- Canadian Polar Commission - Northern Scientific Training Program
- IPCC
- Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation Scholarship
- William Dawson Scholar Award of McGill University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, we present the Inter-Institutional Gap (IIG) framework as a novel approach to conceptualizing the often-overlooked interconnectivity of different rule-levels between formal and informal institutions in a natural resource system. This framework goes beyond the existing concepts of legal pluralism, institutional void, structural hole, and cultural mismatch, each of which offer valuable insights to particular gaps between formal and informal institutions, but do not sufficiently address the interaction at every rule level (i.e. constitutional choice, collective choice and operational choice rules). In order to demonstrate the potential of our framework for better understanding the underlying causes of inter-institutional gaps, we apply it to four case studies that encompass diverse geographical locations, governance levels, and social-ecological systems. Results reveal that institutional gaps tend to exist when there are unintended, unforeseen or hidden gaps between the different rule levels operating among the different institutions involved in governing a single resource system. More specifically we observe that: (i) inter-institutional gaps are co-existing, therefore if a certain gap is identified, other gaps may be expected; (ii) certain gaps may reveal latent gaps; and (iii) intermediaries may be key to addressing inter-institutional gaps. In many cases, sustainable natural resource management and regulation cannot be achieved without directly addressing the inter-institutional gaps that exist between formal and informal institutions operating in the same resource system. The framework facilitates analysis and understanding of multi-level governance structures in pursuit of addressing complex natural resource management issues.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available