4.8 Article

Environmentally-friendly conductive cotton fabric as flexible strain sensor based on hot press reduced graphene oxide

Journal

CARBON
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 622-630

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.045

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21174055]
  2. Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province [SJZZ15_0147]
  3. European Commission through the Graphene Flagship
  4. ERC grant Hetero2D
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P02534X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/P02534X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A flexible conductive cotton fabric was demonstrated by formulation and deposition of a graphene oxide (GO) dispersion onto a cotton fabric by vacuum filtration. The deposited GO amount was controlled by the concentration and volume of the GO dispersion. The GO was reduced by a hot press method at 180 degrees C for 60 min, and no chemical reductant was needed in both the deposition and reduction processes. The carbon-oxygen ratio increased from 1.77 to 3.72 after the hot press reduction. The as-prepared flexible conductive cotton fabric showed a sheet resistance as low as 0.9 k Omega/sq. The sheet resistance of the conductive cotton fabric only increased from similar to 0.9 k Omega/sq to similar to 1.2 k Omega/sq after 10 washing cycles, exhibiting good washability. The conductive cotton fabric showed viability as a strain sensor even after 400 bending cycles, in which the stable change in the electrical resistance went from similar to 3500 k Omega under tensile strain to similar to 10 k Omega under compressive strain. This cost-effective and environmentally-friendly method can be easily extended to scalable production of reduced GO based flexible conductive cotton fabrics. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available