Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 637-650Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2525-5
Keywords
Scientometrics; Quality; Quantity; Performance; Indicators; Citation; Impact; Journal evaluation; Journal impact factor; Exergy
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Quantity and quality are Aristotelian categories. Ever since Galileo, the defining feature of Science is the accurate measure of quantity, e.g., time, length and mass, to begin with. Length and mass are size dependent. Quality remained an elusive category as it is a size-independent feature. It was Archimedes who first brought a revolution in physics by defining density as a size-independent attribute. A similar revolution was effected in the measurement of science when Eugene Garfield introduced the concept of the citation as a unit of measurement and from this, separated quantity (number of publications) from quality (impact). In this article, we interpret impact as a thermodynamic mean instead of a simplistic arithmetic mean. This opens up rich analogies with the conservation laws of mechanics and thermodynamic features linking disorder and unevenness to entropy. Also as in physics, considerations of dimensional homogeneity play a defining role. Without Garfield's bold initiative, all this will have eluded us for some time.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available