4.7 Review

Vitamin B6 metabolism in microbes and approaches for fermentative production

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 31-40

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.004

Keywords

Vitamin B6; Metabolic engineering; Bacillus subtilis; Escherichia coli; Co-culture engineering; Promiscuous enzyme; Laboratory evolution; Metabolic crosstalk

Funding

  1. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  2. Max-Buchner-Forschungsstiftung [MBFSSt 3381]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [CO 1139/1-2, GSC 226/2]
  4. HIF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vitamin B6 is a designation for the six vitamers pyridoxal, pyridoxine, pyridoxamine, pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), pyridoxine 5'-phosphate, and pyridoxamine. PLP, being the most important B6 vitamer, serves as a cofactor for many proteins and enzymes. In contrast to other organisms, animals and humans have to ingest vitamin B6 with their food. Several disorders are associated with vitamin B6 deficiency. Moreover, pharmaceuticals interfere with metabolism of the cofactor, which also results in vitamin B6 deficiency. Therefore, vitamin B6 is a valuable compound for the pharmaceutical and the food industry. Although vitamin B6 is currently chemically synthesized, there is considerable interest on the industrial side to shift from chemical processes to sustainable fermentation technologies. Here, we review recent findings regarding biosynthesis and homeostasis of vitamin B6 and describe the approaches that have been made in the past to develop microbial production processes. Moreover, we will describe novel routes for vitamin B6 biosynthesis and discuss their potential for engineering bacteria that overproduce the commercially valuable substance. We also highlight bottlenecks of the vitamin B6 biosynthetic pathways and propose strategies to circumvent these limitations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available