4.7 Article

Efficacy of Brassica carinata pellets to inhibit mycelial growth and chlamydospores germination of Phytophthora nicotianae at different temperature regimes

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages 126-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.01.002

Keywords

Biofence; Biofumigation; Brassica amendments; Isothiocyanates; Soilborne pathogens; Paprika pepper

Categories

Funding

  1. INIA [RTA2011-00005-C03-02]
  2. FEDER funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phytophthora nicotianae causes root and crown rot disease in open field paprika pepper crops of Extremadura (western Spain). Sensitivity of the vegetative structures (mycelia and chlamydospores) of P. nicotianae to Brassica carinata pellets (Biofence) was evaluated in vitro at different doses (3, 6, 12 and 24 mg of pellet per plate) and temperatures (15, 20, 25 and 30 degrees C). The effectiveness of the pellets varied depending on the dose. An inhibition effect that decreased with time, was observed in the mycelial growth and chlamydospores germination in plate. The highest dose of pellets tested (24 mg) was fungi toxic to mycelium regardless of temperature for all the isolates. Moreover, biofumigation was effective to suppres chlamydospores germination when the pellets were incorporated into the soil (1.5 and 3 g L-1 of soil) under different temperature regimes. In bioassays with pepper plants, both rates of B. carinata pellets (1.5 and 3 g L-1 of soil) reduced populations of P. nicotianae below the limits of detection of our bioassay (<2 CFU (g-1) of soil) after a 4-week biofumigation treatment and totally controlled the disease. The results suggest that chlamydospores of P. nicotianae in the soil might be suppressed by the commercial rates of B. carinata pellets, although further studies are required in more real soil conditions to form part of integrated pest management program. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available