3.8 Article

How to reinvent the High Street: evidence from the HS2020

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 380-391

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JPMD-03-2017-0031

Keywords

High Street; Retail; Reinvention; HS2020

Funding

  1. ESRC [ES/L005182/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L005182/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to present and critically discuss the findings of the ESRC-funded HS2020 project. The aim is to discuss the retail-led change that has happened to the High Streets that participated to the project that, in some cases, is revolutionary and is leading to the reinvention of the place. To do so reference is made to various retail change theories discussing both institutional and consumer-led change. Design/methodology/approach - This is a discussion paper on the findings of the HS2020 project. Findings - The major finding reported in this paper is that the reinvention is a natural learning process that involves the comprehension of change and the development of knowledge that will lead to the reinvention of the High Street. Research limitations/implications - The findings of the research are based on data that were collected from a total of ten towns across the UK. Practical implications - The paper suggests that to reinvent the High Street the stakeholders that are involved in the place decision-making processes they should embrace the change as a natural development and try to understand and learn from it rather than resisting to it. The HS2020 project provides a comprehensive guide of the areas that change can bemanaged and if it happens it can facilitate the reinvention. Originality/value - The paper is relevant to the academic community, as it offers insight to the theories of retail change, and to the practitioners, as it provides evidence as to how to deal with the change that happens to the High Streets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available