4.6 Article

Ensemble modified independent component analysis for enhanced non-Gaussian process monitoring

Journal

CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 34-41

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.09.014

Keywords

Modified independent component analysis; Fault detection; Ensemble learning

Funding

  1. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [61503204]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Y16F030001]
  4. Science & Technology Planning Project of Zhejiang [2015C31017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a multivariate statistical tool, the modified independent component analysis (MICA) has drawn considerable attention within the non-Gaussian process monitoring circle since it can solve two main problems in the original ICA method. Despite the diversity in applications, the determination logic for non-quadratic functions involved in the iterative procedures of MICA algorithm has always been empirical. Given that the MICA is an unsupervised modeling method, a direct rational study that can conclusively demonstrate which non-quadratic function is optimal for the general purpose of fault detection is inaccessible. The selection of non-quadratic functions is still a challenge that has rarely been attempted. Recognition of this issue and motivated by the superiority of ensemble learning strategy, a novel ensemble MICA (EMICA) modeling approach is presented for enhancing non-Gaussian process monitoring performance. Instead of focusing on a single non-quadratic function, the proposed method combines multiple base MICA models derived from different non-quadratic functions into an ensemble one, and the Bayesian inference is employed as a decision fusion method to form a unique monitoring index for fault detection. The enhanced fault detectability of the EMICA method is also illustrated on two industrial processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available