4.8 Article

Lung cancer-associated pulmonary hypertension: Role of microenvironmental inflammation based on tumor cell-immune cell cross-talk

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 416, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9048

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary System
  3. Verein zur Forderung der Krebsforschung in Giessen e.V.
  4. Von-Behring-Rontgen-Stiftung grant
  5. Rhon Klinikum AG grant
  6. LOEWE UGMLC grant
  7. German Center for Lung Research (DZL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dyspnea is a frequent, devastating, and poorly understood symptom of advanced lung cancer. In our cohort, among 519 patients who underwent a computed tomography scan for the diagnosis of lung cancer, 250 had a mean pulmonary artery diameter of >28 mm, indicating pulmonary hypertension (PH). In human lung cancer tissue, we consistently observed increased vascular remodeling and perivascular inflammatory cell accumulation (macrophages/ lymphocytes). Vascular remodeling, PH, and perivascular inflammatory cell accumulation were mimicked in three mouse models of lung cancer (LLC1, KRas(LA2), and cRaf-BxB). In contrast, NOD. Cg-Prkdc(scid) Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ immunodeficient xenograft and dominant-negative IKK2 mutant triple transgenic (Sftpc-rtTA/Tet-O-Ikk2DN) mice did not develop PH. Coculturing human lung cancer cells with macrophages and lymphocytes strongly up-regulated cytokine release, provoking enhanced migration, apoptosis resistance, and phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5)-mediated up-regulation of human lung vascular cells, which are typical features of PH. The PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil largely suppressed PH in the LLC1 model. We conclude that lung cancer-associated PH represents a distinct PH category; targeting inflammation in the micro-environment and PDE5 offers a potential therapeutic option.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available