4.8 Article

Stress hormones promote EGFR inhibitor resistance in NSCLC: Implications for combinations with β-blockers

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 415, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao4307

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. LUNGevity Foundation
  2. Lung SPORE [5 P50 CA070907]
  3. Lung Cancer Moon Shot Program, NIH Cancer Center Support Grant [CA016672]
  4. Hallman Fund [1R01 CA190628]
  5. Bruton Endowed Chair in Tumor Biology
  6. Stading Fund for EGFR inhibitor resistance
  7. Fox Lung EGFR Inhibitor
  8. Rexanna Foundation for Fighting Lung Cancer
  9. American Cancer Society
  10. [CA109298]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance mediated by T790M-independent mechanisms remains a major challenge in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We identified a targetable mechanism of EGFR inhibitor resistance whereby stress hormones activate beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(2)-ARs) on NSCLC cells, which cooperatively signal with mutant EGFR, resulting in the inactivation of the tumor suppressor, liver kinase B1 (LKB1), and subsequently induce interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression. We show that stress and beta(2)-AR activation promote tumor growth and EGFR inhibitor resistance, which can be abrogated with beta-blockers or IL-6 inhibition. IL-6 was associated with a worse outcome in EGFR TKI-treated NSCLC patients, and beta-blocker use was associated with lower IL-6 concentrations and improved benefit from EGFR inhibitors. These findings provide evidence that chronic stress hormones promote EGFR TKI resistance via beta(2)-AR signaling by an LKB1/CREB (cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate response element-binding protein)/IL-6-dependent mechanism and suggest that combinations of beta-blockers with EGFR TKIs merit further investigation as a strategy to abrogate resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available