4.7 Review

In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 8124-8147

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4316-y

Keywords

Mercury; Soil contamination; In situ remediation; Immobilization; Stabilization

Funding

  1. Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation, Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Applied Field Research Initiative (AFRI) Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
  2. DOE [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mercury from anthropogenic activities is a pollutant that poses significant risks to humans and the environment. In soils, mercury remediation can be technically challenging and costly, depending on the subsurface mercury distribution, the types of mercury species, and the regulatory requirements. This paper introduces the chemistry of mercury and its implications for in situ mercury remediation, which is followed by a detailed discussion of several in situ Hg remediation technologies in terms of applicability, cost, advantages, and disadvantages. The effect of Hg speciation on remediation performance, as well as Hg transformation during different remediation processes, was detailed. Thermal desorption, electrokinetic, and soil flushing/washing treatments are removal technologies that mobilize and capture insoluble Hg species, while containment, solidification/stabilization, and vitrification immobilize Hg by converting it to less soluble forms. Two emerging technologies, phytoremediation and nanotechnology, are also discussed in this review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available