4.5 Review

Statistical and computational intelligence approach to analytic continuation in Quantum Monte Carlo

Journal

ADVANCES IN PHYSICS-X
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 302-323

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23746149.2017.1288585

Keywords

Analytic continuation; inverse problems; genetic algorithms; quantum liquids; dynamics; elementary excitations

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1409510]
  2. Universita degli Studi di Milano [620]
  3. ECT*
  4. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca [PRIN 2012Z3N9R9]
  5. Simons Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The term analytic continuation emerges in many branches of Mathematics, Physics, and, more generally, applied Science. Generally speaking, in many situations, given some amount of information that could arise from experimental or numerical measurements, one is interested in extending the domain of such information, to infer the values of some variables which are central for the study of a given problem. For example, focusing on Condensed Matter Physics, state-of-the-art methodologies to study strongly correlated quantum physical systems are able to yield accurate estimations of dynamical correlations in imaginary time. Those functions have to be extended to the whole complex plane, via analytic continuation, in order to infer real-time properties of those physical systems. In this review, we will present the Genetic Inversion via Falsification of Theories method, which allowed us to compute dynamical properties of strongly interacting quantum many-body systems with very high accuracy. Even though the method arose in the realm of Condensed Matter Physics, it provides a very general framework to face analytic continuation problems that could emerge in several areas of applied Science. Here, we provide a pedagogical review that elucidates the approach we have developed. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available