4.2 Review

Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Bleeding Diathesis Associated With Ibrutinib Treatment: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 31-37

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.09.010

Keywords

Anticoagulation; Atrial flutter; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Mantle cell lymphoma; Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

Funding

  1. Mayo Foundation for Education and Research
  2. Bressler Alpert Society research grant from University of Arizona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of the present study was to precisely assess the risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter (Afib/Aflutter) and bleeding associated with ibrutinib compared to other treatments. The risks of Afib/Aflutter and all-grade bleeding were significantly higher in the ibrutinib group. Background: Clinical trials raised concern that ibrutinib may increase the risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter (Afib/Aflutter) and major bleeding. However, the association has not been statistically validated, and there is no consensus regarding optimal management of anticoagulation among patients receiving ibrutinib who develop Afib/Aflutter. We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis to precisely assess the risk of Afib/Aflutter and bleeding associated with ibrutinib treatment in patients with hematologic malignancies. Patients and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and meeting abstracts up to May 15, 2016, for randomized controlled trials comparing ibrutinib to chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody, or a combination. Primary outcomes were serious Afib/Aflutter and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were all-grade Afib/Aflutter and bleeding. We calculated the Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) and estimated the effect of the treatments using a fixed-effects model. Results: Ibrutinib treatment was associated with a significantly higher incidence of serious Afib/Aflutter (3.03% vs. 0.80%, RR = 3.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56-9.29, P = .003), all-grade Afib/Aflutter (8.18% vs. 0.93%, RR = 8.81, 95% CI = 2.70-28.75, P = .0003), and all-grade bleeding (4.85% vs. 1.55%, RR = 2.93, 95% CI = 1.14-7.52, P = .03) compared to control treatments. The observed between-treatment difference in major bleeding rates was not statistically significant (3.69% vs. 2.13%, RR = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.95-3.11, P = .07). The risk of these adverse events was not different between subgroups on the basis of pathology, treatment setting, dose, and duration of ibrutinib exposure. Conclusion: The risks of Afib/Aflutter and all-grade bleeding were significantly higher in the ibrutinib group. These results indicate the need for vigilant monitoring while the patient is receiving ibrutinib therapy, and careful assessment of the risks and benefits of anticoagulation is required. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available