4.7 Article

The contribution of volunteer-based monitoring data to the assessment of harmful phytoplankton blooms in Brazilian urban streams

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 584, Issue -, Pages 586-594

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.080

Keywords

Citizen science; Cyanobacteria; Eutrophication; Nutrients; Urban water bodies

Funding

  1. HSBC Bank under the HSBC Water Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban streams are vulnerable to a range of impacts, leading to the impairment of ecosystem services. However, studies on phytoplankton growth in tropical lotic systems are still limited. Citizen science approaches use trained volunteers to collect environmental data. We combined data on urban streams collected by volunteers with data obtained by professional scientists to identify potential drivers of phytoplankton community and determine thresholds for Cyanobacteria development. We combined datasets (n = 117) on water quality and environmental observations in 64 Brazilian urban streams with paired data on phytoplankton. Sampling activities encompassed dry (July 2013 and July 2015) and warm (February and November 2014) seasons. Volunteers quantified phosphate (PO43-), nitrate (NO3-) and turbidity in each stream using colorimetric and optical methods and recorded environmental conditions in the immediate surroundings of the sites through visual observations. We used non-parametric statistics to identify correlations among nutrients, turbidity and phytoplankton. We also looked for thresholds with respect to high Cyanobacteria abundance (>50,000 cells/mL). The streams were characterized by relatively high nutrient concentrations (PO43- : 0.11 mg/L; NO3-: 2.6 mg/L) and turbidity (49 NTU). Phytoplanlcton densities reached 189,000 cells/mL, mainly potentially toxic Cyanobacteria species. Moderate but significant (p < 0.05) correlations were observed between phytoplankton density and turbidity (rho = 0.338, Spearman) and PO43- (rho = 0292), but not with NO3-. Other important variables (river flow, temperature and light) were not assessed. Volunteers' observations covaried with phytoplankton density (p < 0.05, Krusl

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available