4.7 Article

Human and veterinary pharmaceuticals in the marine environment including fish farms in Korea

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 579, Issue -, Pages 940-949

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.039

Keywords

Antibiotic; Anthelmintic; Fish farm; Cultured fish; Seawater; Sediment

Funding

  1. National Institute of Fisheries Science [R2016054]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [NRF-2015R1C1A2A01051544]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The occurrence trends and effects of 30 human and veterinary pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics, anthelmintics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and -blockers, in the marine environment, with a focus on seawater, sediment, cultured fish, and their feed collected from coastal and fish farm areas in the southern sea of Korea, were investigated. The concentrations of total pharmaceuticals in coastal area seawater (mean: 533 ng/L) were higher than those in fish farm seawater (mean: 300 ng/L), while the opposite trend (coastal area: 136 ng/g dry wt < fish farm area; 195 ng/g dry wt) was observed for sediment samples. Regarding cultured fish, the concentration of total pharmaceuticals in fish muscle (mean: 5.08 ng/g wet wt) was lower than that in organs (mean: 14.1 ng/g wet wt). However, not all compounds were present at higher concentrations in organs. Characteristic distribution patterns of pharmaceuticals were observed according to sample types and sampling sites based on the predominance of various antibiotics in fish farms (including cultured fish and feed) and the predominance of pharmaceuticals of terrestrial origin (human and livestock) in coastal areas. Pharmaceuticals used as fish drugs, such as sulfadiazine, erythromycin, and trimethoprim, were commonly detected in fish farm media (seawater, sediment, and cultured fish), which might contaminate fish farm media. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available