4.7 Article

Persistence and risk of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes in major mariculture sites in Southeast China

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 580, Issue -, Pages 1175-1184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.075

Keywords

Antibiotic residues; Sulfonamides resistance genes; Tetracyclines resistance genes; Mariculture; Sediment-water interactions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41171376]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research [2016RCDW02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibiotics are widely used in mariculture industry, and this study attempts to determine the extent of water and sediment pollution by aritibiotic residues in 13 major mariculture sites in China. Through chemical and molecular biology analysis, the results showed that the total concentrations of sulfonamides and tetracyclines were in the range 62.0-373.8 ng L-1 and 0.2-259.1 ng L-1 respectively in water samples, and in the range 0.19-1.59 ng g(-1) dry weight and 3.45-74.84 ng g(-1) dry weight respectively, in sediments samples. The occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) was detected in all sites. Compared with the tetracyclines resistance genes, the absolute copy number and relative abundance of the sulfonamides resistance genes were 4.3 times and 2.3 times higher in water and sediment from the mariculture sites, With the dominant resistance genes being sul2. The abundance of sul3 in the water phase was significantly correlated with the concentrations of sulfamerazine, while the abundance of sul2 in the sediment phase was significantly with sulfadiazine concentrations. The abundance of tetM in the sediment phase was significantly correlated with the concentrations of oxytetracycline. The findings demonstrate the persistence of antibiotic residues and ARGs in major mariculture sites in Southeast China. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available