4.7 Article

Cotransport of human adenoviruses with clay colloids and TiO2 nanoparticles in saturated porous media: Effect of flow velocity

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 598, Issue -, Pages 160-167

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.082

Keywords

Human adenoviruses; Clay minerals; TiO2 nanoparticles; Cotransport; Porous media

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social Fund-ESF)
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational program Education and Lifelong Learning of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)-Research Funding Program: Aristeia I [1185]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the effects of two clay colloids (kaolinite, KGa-1b and montmorillonite, STx-1b) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) on human adenovirus transport and retention in water saturated porous media at three different pore water velocities (038, 0.74, and 1.21 cm/min). Transport and cotransport experiments were performed in 30-cm long laboratory columns packed with clean glass beads with 2 mm diameter. The experimental results suggested that the presence of KGa-lb, STx-1b and TiO2 NPs increased human adenovirus inactivation and attachment onto the solid matrix, due to the additional attachment sites available. Retention by the packed column was found to be highest (up to 99%) in the presence of TiO2 NPs at the highest pore water velocity, and lowest in the presence of KGa-1b. The experimental results suggested that adenoviruses would undergo substantial aggregation or heteroaggregation during cotransport. However, no distinct relationships between mass recoveries and water velocity could be established from the experimental cotransport data. Note that for the cotransport experiments, collision efficiency values were shown to be higher for the higher flow rate examined in this study. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available