4.7 Article

Joint carbon footprint assessment and data envelopment analysis for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture production

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 593, Issue -, Pages 36-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.147

Keywords

Carbon footprint reduction; Data Envelopment Analysis; Life cycle assessment; Environmental sustainability; Eco-efficiency; Agriculture production

Funding

  1. FAPERJ (Brazil) [E-26/102.949/2012]
  2. Research Administration of Universidad de Talca (Chile) [RU-1010-2015]
  3. CORFO Project [14ENI2-26866 (PE-2015-5)]
  4. CYTED program [P515RT0123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Operations management tools are critical in the process of evaluating and implementing action towards a low carbon production. Currently, a sustainable production implies both an efficient resource use and the obligation to meet targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The carbon footprint (CF) tool allows estimating the overall amount of GHG emissions associated with a product or activity throughout its life cycle. In this paper, we propose a four-step method for a joint use of CF assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Following the eco-efficiency definition, which is the delivery of goods using fewer resources and with decreasing environmental impact, we use an output oriented DEA model to maximize production and reduce CF, taking into account simultaneously the economic and ecological perspectives. In another step, we stablish targets for the contributing CF factors in order to achieve CF reduction. The proposed method was applied to assess the eco-efficiency of five organic blueberry orchards throughout three growing seasons. The results show that this method is a practical tool for determining eco-efficiency and reducing GHG emissions. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available