4.7 Review

Combination of Fenton processes and biotreatment for wastewater treatment and soil remediation

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 574, Issue -, Pages 1599-1610

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.199

Keywords

Fenton processes; Biotreatment; Wastewater; Contaminated soil; Remediation

Funding

  1. Program for the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378190, 51278176, 51408206, 51579098, 51521006]
  2. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals of China
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0186]
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-13R17]
  6. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [521293050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a continuously increasing worldwide concern for the development of wastewater and contaminated soil treatment technologies. Fenton processes and biological treatments have long been used as common technologies for treating wastewater and polluted soil but they still need to be modified because of some defects (high costs of Fenton process and long remediation time of biotreatments). This work first briefly introduced the Fenton technology and biotreatment, and then discussed the main considerations in the construction of a combined system. This review shows a critical overview of recent researches combining Fenton processes (as pretreatment or post-treatment) with bioremediation for treatment of wastewater or polluted soil. We concluded that the combined treatment can be regarded as a novel and competitive technology. Furthermore, the outlook for potential applications of this combination in different polluted soil and wastewater, as well as the mechanism of combination was also discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available