4.6 Article

Effects of procalcitonin testing on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in patients with upper respiratory tract infections. An individual patient data meta-analysis

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 170-177

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0252

Keywords

lower antibiotic exposure; meta-analysis; primary care setting; procalcitonin; procalcitonin guided antibiotic prescription; upper respiratory tract infection

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [3300C0-107772]
  2. Association for the Promotion of Science and Postgraduate Training of the University Hospital Basel
  3. BRAHMS
  4. bioMerieux
  5. funds of the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft, Basel, Switzerland
  6. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Basel, Switzerland
  7. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Basel, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Several trials found procalcitonin (PCT) helpful for guiding antibiotic treatment in patients with lower respiratory tract infections and sepsis. We aimed to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis on the effects of PCT guided antibiotic therapy in upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published until September 2016. We reanalysed individual data of adult URTI patients with a clinical diagnosis of URTI. Data of two trials were used based on PRISMA-IPD guidelines. Safety outcomes were (1) treatment failure defined as death, hospitalization, ARI-specific complications, recurrent or worsening infection at 28 days follow-up; and (2) restricted activity within a 14-day follow-up. Secondary endpoints were initiation of antibiotic therapy, and total days of antibiotic exposure. Results: In total, 644 patients with a follow up of 28 days had a final diagnosis of URTI and were thus included in this analysis. There was no difference in treatment failure (33.1% vs. 34.0%, OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.4; p = 0.896) and days with restricted activity between groups (8.0 vs. 8.0 days, regression coefficient 0.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.9), p = 0.465). However, PCT guided antibiotic therapy resulted in lower antibiotic prescription (17.8% vs. 51.0%, OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.3; p < 0.001) and in a 2.4 day (95% CI -2.9 to -1.9; p < 0.001) shorter antibiotic exposure compared to control patients. Conclusions: PCT guided antibiotic therapy in the primary care setting was associated with reduced antibiotic exposure in URTI patients without compromising outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available