4.2 Article

Marked yield of re-evaluating phenotype and exome/target sequencing data in 33 individuals with intellectual disabilities

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 176, Issue 1, Pages 107-115

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38542

Keywords

developmental delay; intellectual disability; re-evaluation; target sequencing; whole exome sequencing

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Foundation [201540054, 20154Y0153]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400872, 30973216, 81401193]
  3. Shanghai Health Bureau [20134005]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0905100]
  5. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [2014XJ10044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diagnosis of intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) benefits from the clinical application of target/exome sequencing. The yield in Mendelian diseases varies from 25% to 68%. The aim of the present study was to identify the genetic causes of 33 ID/DD patients using target/exome sequencing. Recent studies have demonstrated that reanalyzing undiagnosed exomes could yield additional diagnosis. Therefore, in addition to the normal data analysis, in this study, re-evaluation was performed prior to manuscript preparation after updating OMIM annotations, calling copy number variations (CNVs) and reviewing the current literature. Molecular diagnosis was obtained for 19/33 patients in the first round of analysis. Notably, five patients were diagnosed during the re-evaluation of the geno/phenotypic data. This study confirmed the utility of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of ID/DD. Furthermore, re-evaluation leads to a 15% improvement in diagnostic yield. Thus, to maximize the diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing (NGS), periodical re-evaluation of the geno/phenotypic data of undiagnosed individuals is recommended by updating the OMIM annotation, applying new algorithms, reviewing the literature, sharing pheno/genotypic data, and re-contacting patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available