4.7 Review

Fatigue behavior of high-entropy alloys: A review

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 168-178

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-017-9137-4

Keywords

high-entropy alloys; fatigue behaviour; statistical modelling; fatigue crack growth

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory [DE-FE-0024054, DE-FE-0011194]
  2. U.S. Army Research Office Project [W911NF-13-1-0438]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1611180]
  4. QuesTek Innovation LLC
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 105-2221-E-007-017-MY3]
  6. Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the National Tsing Hua University (Taiwan)
  7. School of Materials Science and Engineering of the Dalian University of Technology, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fatigue failures cost approximately 4% of the United States' gross domestic product (GDP). The design of highly fatigue-resistant materials is always in demand. Different from conventional strategies of alloy design, high-entropy alloys (HEAs) are defined as materials with five or more principal elements, which could be solid solutions. This locally-disordered structure is expected to lead to unique fatigue-resistant properties. In this review, the studies of the fatigue behavior of HEAs during the last five years are summarized. The four-point-bending high-cycle fatigue coupled with statistical modelling, and the fatigue-crack-growth behavior of HEAs, are reviewed. The effects of sample defects and nanotwins-deformation mechanisms on four-point-bending high-cycle fatigue of HEAs are discussed in detail. The influence of stress ratio and temperature on fatigue-crack-growth characteristics of HEAs is also discussed. HEAs could exhibit comparable or greater fatigue properties, relative to conventional materials. Finally, the possible future work regarding the fatigue behavior of HEAs is suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available