4.2 Article

Do age and linguistic background alter the audiovisual advantage when listening to speech in the presence of energetic and informational masking?

Journal

ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 242-261

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1423-5

Keywords

Audiovisual speech perception; Sensory and cognitive aging; Informational and energetic masking

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-15359, TEA-12497]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN 9952-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined how the type of masker presented in the background affected the extent to which visual information enhanced speech recognition, and whether the effect was dependent on or independent of age and linguistic competence. In the present study, young speakers of English as a first language (YEL1) and English as a second language (YEL2), as well as older speakers of English as a first language (OEL1), were asked to complete an audio (A) and an audiovisual (AV) speech recognition task in which they listened to anomalous target sentences presented against a background of one of three masker types (noise, babble, and competing speech). All three main effects were found to be statistically significant (group, masker type, A vs. AV presentation type). Interesting two-way interactions were found between masker type and group and between masker type and presentation type; however, no interactions were found between group (age and/or linguistic competence) and presentation type (A vs. AV). The results of this study, while they shed light on the effect of masker type on the AV advantage, suggest that age and linguistic competence have no significant effects on the extent to which a listener is able to use visual information to improve speech recognition in background noise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available