4.8 Article

Combination of Hybrid CVD and Cation Exchange for Upscaling Cs-Substituted Mixed Cation Perovskite Solar Cells with High Efficiency and Stability

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201703835

Keywords

large area; mixed cation; modules; perovskite solar cell; stability

Funding

  1. Energy Materials and Surface Sciences Unit of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
  2. OIST R&D Cluster Research Program
  3. OIST Proof of Concept (POC) Program
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [15K17925]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K17925] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mixed cation hybrid perovskites such as Cs(x)FA(1-x)PbI(3) are promising materials for solar cell applications, due to their excellent photoelectronic properties and improved stability. Although power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) as high as 18.16% have been reported, devices are mostly processed by the anti-solvent method, which is difficult for further scaling-up. Here, a method to fabricate Cs(x)FA(1-x)PbI(3) by performing Cs cation exchange on hybrid chemical vapor deposition grown FAPbI(3) with the Cs+ ratio adjustable from 0 to 24% is reported. The champion perovskite module based on Cs(0.07)FA(0.93)PbI(3) with an active area of 12.0 cm(2) shows a module PCE of 14.6% and PCE loss/area of 0.17% cm(-2), demonstrating the significant advantage of this method toward scaling-up. This in-depth study shows that when the perovskite films prepared by this method contain 6.6% Cs+ in bulk and 15.0% at the surface, that is, Cs(0.07)FA(0.93)PbI(3), solar cell devices show not only significantly increased PCEs but also substantially improved stability, due to favorable energy level alignment with TiO2 electron transport layer and spiro-MeOTAD hole transport layer, increased grain size, and improved perovskite phase stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available