4.7 Article

Conservation analysis of long non-coding RNAs in plants

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 190-198

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9174-9

Keywords

lncRNA; conservation; monocots; dicots; rice

Categories

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR16C060001]
  2. National Key Program on Transgenic Research
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016QNA6014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are gene regulators that have vital roles in development and adaptation to the environment in eukaryotes. However, the structural and evolutionary analyses of plant lncRNAs are limited. In this study, we performed an analysis of lncRNAs in five monocot and five dicot species. Our results showed that plant lncRNA genes were generally shorter and had fewer exons than protein-coding genes. The numbers of lncRNAs were positively correlated with the numbers of protein-coding genes in different plant species, despite a high range of variation. Sequence conservation analysis showed that the majority of lncRNAs had high sequence conservation at the intra-species and sub-species levels, reminiscent of protein-coding genes. At the inter-species level, a subset of lncRNAs were highly diverged at the nucleotide level, but conserved by position. Interestingly, we found that plant lncRNAs have identical splicing signals, and those which can form precursors or targets of miRNAs have a conservative identity in different species. We also revealed that most of the lowly expressed lncRNAs were tissue-specific, while those highly conserved were constitutively transcribed. Meanwhile, we characterized a subset of rice lncRNAs that were co-expressed with their adjacent protein-coding genes, suggesting they may play cis-regulatory roles. These results will contribute to understanding the biological significance and evolution of lncRNAs in plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available