4.6 Article

Enumeration and characterization of circulating multiple myeloma cells in patients with plasma cell disorders

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 1, Pages 71-81

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15003

Keywords

multiple myeloma; circulating tumour cell; smouldering myeloma; plasma cell; biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. Janssen RD, L.L.C
  2. Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed an automated assay to enumerate and characterize circulating multiple myeloma cells (CMMC) from peripheral blood of patients with plasma cell disorders. CMMC show expression of genes characteristic of myeloma and fluorescence in situ hybridisation results on CMMC correlated well with bone marrow results. We enumerated CMMC from over 1000 patient samples including separate cohorts of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and high/intermediate risk smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM) with clinical follow-up data. In newly diagnosed myeloma patient samples, CMMC counts correlated with other clinical measures of disease burden, including the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells, serum M protein, and International Staging System stage. CMMC counts decreased significantly from baseline when a remission was achieved due to treatment (P<0.001). Patients with CMMC counts >= 100 at remission showed reduced survival relative to patients with CMMC counts <100. Patients with undetectable CMMC in remission showed further overall survival benefits. In the SMM cohort, there was a trend toward higher CMMC in patients with higher-risk myeloma precursor states. Significantly higher CMMC counts were observed between intermediate/high risk SMM patients that progressed versus those without progression (P=0.031). CMMC allow a non-invasive means of monitoring tumour biology and may have use as a prognostic test for patients with plasma cell disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available