4.7 Article

Chemical Abundance Analysis of Three α-poor, Metal-poor Stars in the Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxy Horologium I

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 852, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa01d

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: dwarf; stars: abundances; stars: chemically peculiar

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-StG-335936]
  2. NSF [AST-1560223]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation
  5. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  9. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  10. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  11. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  12. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  13. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  14. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  15. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  16. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  17. Dark Energy Survey
  18. Argonne National Laboratory
  19. University of California at Santa Cruz
  20. University of Cambridge
  21. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  22. University of Chicago
  23. University College London
  24. DES-Brazil Consortium
  25. University of Edinburgh
  26. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  27. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  28. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  29. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  30. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  31. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  32. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  33. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  34. University of Michigan
  35. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  36. University of Nottingham
  37. Ohio State University
  38. University of Pennsylvania
  39. University of Portsmouth
  40. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University
  41. University of Sussex
  42. Texas AM University
  43. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  44. MINECO [AYA2015-71825, ESP2015-88861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2012-0234, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  45. ERDF funds from European Union
  46. Generalitat de Catalunya
  47. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program
  48. ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  49. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  50. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  51. STFC [ST/M001334/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present chemical abundance measurements of three stars in the ultrafaint dwarf galaxy Horologium I, a Milky Way satellite discovered by the Dark Energy Survey. Using high-resolution spectroscopic observations, we measure the metallicity of the three stars, as well as abundance ratios of several alpha-elements, iron-peak elements, and neutron-capture elements. The abundance pattern is relatively consistent among all three stars, which have a low average metallicity of [Fe/H]similar to -2.6 and are not alpha-enhanced ([alpha/Fe] similar to 0.0). This result is unexpected when compared to other low-metallicity stars in the Galactic halo and other ultrafaint dwarfs and suggests the possibility of a different mechanism for the enrichment of Hor I compared to other satellites. We discuss possible scenarios that could lead to this observed nucleosynthetic signature, including extended star formation, enrichment by a Population III supernova, and or an association with the Large Magellanic Cloud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available