Journal
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 505-528Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
Keywords
Algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Data ethics; Good society; Human dignity
Categories
Funding
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N02334X/1, EP/N023013/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- PETRAS [DePrIoT, P&T(S), PEIESI] Funding Source: researchfish
- Alan Turing Institute [TU/C/000005, TU/A/000015, TU/B/000064] Funding Source: researchfish
- EPSRC [EP/N023013/1, EP/N02334X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In October 2016, the White House, the European Parliament, and the UK House of Commons each issued a report outlining their visions on how to prepare society for the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we provide a comparative assessment of these three reports in order to facilitate the design of policies favourable to the development of a 'good AI society'. To do so, we examine how each report addresses the following three topics: (a) the development of a 'good AI society'; (b) the role and responsibility of the government, the private sector, and the research community (including academia) in pursuing such a development; and (c) where the recommendations to support such a development may be in need of improvement. Our analysis concludes that the reports address adequately various ethical, social, and economic topics, but come short of providing an overarching political vision and long-term strategy for the development of a 'good AI society'. In order to contribute to fill this gap, in the conclusion we suggest a two-pronged approach.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available