4.8 Article

A dedicated network for social interaction processing in the primate brain

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 356, Issue 6339, Pages 745-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aam6383

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Human Frontier Science Program Long-Term Fellowship [LT000418/2013-L]
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale Postdoctoral fellowship [SPE20120523854]
  3. WomenAMP
  4. Science Postdoctoral Fellowship
  5. Bettencourt-Schueller Foundation Young Researcher Award
  6. Dorothy-Leet/Association Francaise des Femmes Diplomees des Universites award
  7. Center for Brains, Minds and Machines (CBMM) - NSF STC award [CCF-1231216]
  8. Kavli Neural Systems Institute at The Rockefeller University
  9. National Institute of Mental Health of NIH [R01MH105397]
  10. McKnight Foundation
  11. Pew Charitable Trust
  12. New York Stem Cell Foundation
  13. National Eye Institute of NIH [R01 EY021594]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primate cognition requires interaction processing. Interactions can reveal otherwise hidden properties of intentional agents, such as thoughts and feelings, and of inanimate objects, such as mass and material. Where and how interaction analyses are implemented in the brain is unknown. Using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging in macaque monkeys, we discovered a network centered in the medial and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex that is exclusively engaged in social interaction analysis. Exclusivity of specialization was found for no other function anywhere in the brain. Two additional networks, a parieto-premotor and a temporal one, exhibited both social and physical interaction preference, which, in the temporal lobe, mapped onto a fine-grain pattern of object, body, and face selectivity. Extent and location of a dedicated system for social interaction analysis suggest that this function is an evolutionary forerunner of human mind-reading capabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available