4.8 Article

Eudicot plant-specific sphingolipids determine host selectivity of microbial NLP cytolysins

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 358, Issue 6369, Pages 1431-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aan6874

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Nu70/1-9, SFB1101, INST 186/1167-1]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0391, J1-7515]
  3. Seventh Framework Program BioStinictX [283570]
  4. Japan Ministry for Science and Technology [JP16K08259]
  5. L'Agence Nationale de la Recherche [11-INBS-0010]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy Joint BioEnergy Institute [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [T.1003.14, IAN P7/44 iPros]
  8. Belgian Program on Interuniversity Attraction Poles [IAPP7/44iPros]
  9. University of Liege (HELD)
  10. RISEN Integrated Lipidology Program
  11. RISEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science Wako
  12. Platform Metabolome-Fluxonse-Lipidorne Bordeaux
  13. Gottingen Metabolornics and Lipidomics Platform
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08259] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Necrosis and ethylene-inducing peptide 1-like (NLP) proteins constitute a superfamily of proteins produced by plant pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes. Many NLPs are cytotoxins that facilitate microbial infection of eudicot, but not of monocot plants. Here, we report glycosylinositol phosphorylceramide (GIPC) sphingolipids as NLP toxin receptors. Plant mutants with altered GIPC composition were more resistant to NLP toxins. Binding studies and x-ray crystallography showed that NLPs form complexes with terminal monomeric hexose moieties of GIPCs that result in conformational changes within the toxin. Insensitivity to NLP cytolysins of monocot plants may be explained by the length of the GIPC head group and the architecture of the NLP sugar-binding site. We unveil early steps in NLP cytolysin action that determine plant clade-specific toxin selectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available