4.8 Article

The Impact of Polystyrene Microplastics on Feeding, Function and Fecundity in the Marine Copepod Calanus helgolandicus

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 1130-1137

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es504525u

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/I528034, NE/L007010/1]
  2. NERC [NE/L007010/1, pml010009, NE/L003988/1, pml010007] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [pml010007, pml010009, NE/L007010/1, NE/L003988/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microscopic plastic debris, termed microplastics, are of increasing environmental concern. Recent studies have demonstrated that a range of zooplankton, including copepods, can ingest microplastics. Copepods are a globally abundant class of zooplankton that form a key trophic link between primary producers and higher trophic marine organisms. Here we demonstrate that ingestion of microplastics can significantly alter the feeding capacity of the pelagic copepod Calanus helgolandicus. Exposed to 20 mu m polystyrene beads (75 microplastics mL(-1)) and cultured algae ([250 mu g C L-1) for 24 h, C. helgolandicus ingested 11% fewer algal cells (P = 0.33) and 40% less carbon biomass (P < 0.01). There was a net downward shift in the mean size of algal prey consumed (P < 0.001), with a 3.6 fold increase in ingestion rate for the smallest size class of algal prey (11.6-12.6 mu m), suggestive of postcapture or postingestion rejection. Prolonged exposure to polystyrene microplastics significantly decreased reproductive output, but there were no significant differences in egg production rates, respiration or survival. We constructed a conceptual energetic (carbon) budget showing that microplastic-exposed copepods suffer energetic depletion over time. We conclude that microplastics impede feeding in copepods, which over time could lead to sustained reductions in ingested carbon biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available