4.8 Article

Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 357, Issue 6349, Pages 409-413

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aan6733

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swim Across America Laboratory at Johns Hopkins
  2. Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institutes
  4. Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins
  5. Stand Up to Cancer Colon Cancer Dream Team
  6. Commonwealth Fund
  7. Banyan Gate Foundation
  8. Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research
  9. Bloomberg Foundation
  10. Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center
  11. Merck Co. Inc.
  12. Gastrointestinal SPORE grant [P50CA062924]
  13. NIH [P30CA006973, CA163672, CA43460, CA203891, CA67941, CA16058, CA57345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genomes of cancers deficient in mismatch repair contain exceptionally high numbers of somatic mutations. In a proof-of-concept study, we previously showed that colorectal cancers with mismatch repair deficiency were sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade with antibodies to programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1). We have now expanded this study to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient cancers across 12 different tumor types. Objective radiographic responses were observed in 53% of patients, and complete responses were achieved in 21% of patients. Responses were durable, with median progression-free survival and overall survival still not reached. Functional analysis in a responding patient demonstrated rapid in vivo expansion of neoantigen-specific T cell clones that were reactive to mutant neopeptides found in the tumor. These data support the hypothesis that the large proportion of mutant neoantigens in mismatch repair-deficient cancers make them sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade, regardless of the cancers' tissue of origin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available