4.8 Article

Spin-imbalance in a 2D Fermi-Hubbard system

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 357, Issue 6358, Pages 1385-1388

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7838

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-1607277, DMR-1609560, DMR1309461]
  2. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2016-65128]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Young Investigator Research Program [FA9550-16-1-0269]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation fellowship
  5. U.S. Department of Defense through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program
  6. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  7. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Informacao Quantica
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [1609560] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Materials Research
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1607277] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interplay of strong interactions and magnetic fields gives rise to unusual forms of superconductivity and magnetism in quantum many-body systems. Here, we present an experimental study of the two-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model-a paradigm for strongly correlated fermions on a lattice-in the presence of a Zeeman field and varying doping. Using site-resolved measurements, we revealed anisotropic antiferromagnetic correlations, a precursor to long-range canted order. We observed nonmonotonic behavior of the local polarization with doping for strong interactions, which we attribute to the evolution from an antiferromagnetic insulator to a metallic phase. Our results pave the way to experimentally mapping the low-temperature phase diagram of the Fermi-Hubbard model as a function of both doping and spin polarization, for which many open questions remain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available