Journal
CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 1-6Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01164
Keywords
-
Funding
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [01(2908)/17/EMR-II]
- Pondicherry University
- RGNF
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Three sets of statistical analyses have been performed to evaluate whether C-F or C=O is the better C-H hydrogen bond acceptor and to understand the nature and preferred geometry of the CH-F-C interactions. The first analysis uses Hirshfeld surface of the molecules, which shows that C=O is a better hydrogen bond acceptor than C-F, though C-H center dot center dot center dot F-C interactions also play an important role in crystal packing. The second analysis compares the population densities of C-H center dot center dot center dot F-C interactions at different H center dot center dot center dot F distances and at different CH center dot center dot center dot F or C-F center dot center dot center dot H angles. This analysis shows the directional nature of this interaction. The third analysis shows which combinations of the C-H center dot center dot center dot F andaC-F center dot center dot H angles are preferred by the C-H center dot center dot center dot F-C interactions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available