4.7 Article

F or O, Which One Is the Better Hydrogen Bond (Is It?) Acceptor in C-H•••X-C (X- = F-, O=) Interactions

Journal

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01164

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [01(2908)/17/EMR-II]
  2. Pondicherry University
  3. RGNF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three sets of statistical analyses have been performed to evaluate whether C-F or C=O is the better C-H hydrogen bond acceptor and to understand the nature and preferred geometry of the CH-F-C interactions. The first analysis uses Hirshfeld surface of the molecules, which shows that C=O is a better hydrogen bond acceptor than C-F, though C-H center dot center dot center dot F-C interactions also play an important role in crystal packing. The second analysis compares the population densities of C-H center dot center dot center dot F-C interactions at different H center dot center dot center dot F distances and at different CH center dot center dot center dot F or C-F center dot center dot center dot H angles. This analysis shows the directional nature of this interaction. The third analysis shows which combinations of the C-H center dot center dot center dot F andaC-F center dot center dot H angles are preferred by the C-H center dot center dot center dot F-C interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available