4.6 Article

Multiplex Binding of Amyloid-like Protein Nanofilm to Different Material Surfaces

Journal

COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 42-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colcom.2017.11.009

Keywords

Amyloid; Bioadhesion; Surface modification; Multiplex binding; Interfacial bonding

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51673112, 21374057]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201502001, GK201301006]
  3. 111 Project [B14041]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_14R33]
  5. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2015JM2048]
  6. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm201626]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a reliable universal way to form strongly bonded coating with underlying substrate independent on material chemistry is ideal surface modification strategy and remains great challenge. Recently developed polydopamine and amyloid-based adhesion systems are two representative examples reported so far to fulfill this aim, and nonetheless the universal surface adhesion mechanism in these two cases is still unclear up to now. Herein the systematical studies on the adhesive strength of the amyloid-like coating on metal, organic and inorganic material surfaces reveal a novel multiplex bonding model on polar and non-polar abiotic surfaces, and different binding mode for respective material chemical structure including metal-sulfur coordination bonding, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic and hydrophobic interaction is elucidated with affirmative bonding strength. Our findings lend insight into amyloid adhesion mechanisms and reveal strategies for theory-driven design of engineered adhesives that harness great promise for advanced materials and devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available