4.2 Article

HPA-Axis Activation as a Key Moderator of Childhood Trauma Exposure and Adolescent Mental Health

Journal

JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 149-157

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-017-0282-9

Keywords

Physical abuse; Emotional abuse; Childhood trauma; HPA-axis; Stress; Internalizing; Externalizing

Funding

  1. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation
  2. Barbara A. Oleshansky Memorial Award
  3. American Psychological Foundation
  4. Rackham Graduate School at University of Michigan
  5. National Institute of Mental Health [15750]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individual differences in a child's sensitivity to stress may influence whether youth exposed to trauma develop symptoms of psychopathology. We examined the interaction between HPA-axis reactivity to an acute stressor and exposure to different types of childhood trauma as predictors of mental health symptoms in a sample of youth. Youth (n = 121, ages 9-16; 47% female) completed a standardized stress task, including 5 post-stress salivary cortisol samples. Parents also completed the Child Behavior Checklist as a measure of child internalizing and externalizing symptoms in the past month, and completed the Early Trauma Inventory (ETI) as a measure of their child's trauma exposure. More emotional abuse and non-intentional trauma were associated with greater internalizing symptoms. Youth exposed to physical abuse who demonstrated slower HPA-axis reactivity had elevated internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Youth exposed to emotional abuse or non-intentional traumatic events who demonstrated faster HPA-axis reactivity had elevated internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Profiles of exaggerated or attenuated HPA-axis reactivity to acute stress may be risk factors for psychopathology in children facing different stressful social environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available