4.5 Article

Evaluation of sex differences in the stopover behavior and postdeparture movements of wood-warblers

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 117-127

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arx123

Keywords

behavior; migration; protandry; radiotelemetry; stopover; wood-warblers

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Ontario Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sex differences in the behaviors underlying avian protandry, where males arrive at breeding areas earlier than females, are still poorly understood for most species. We tested for sex differences in stopover behavior, refueling rates, and postdeparture movements during spring migration in 2 consecutive years in wood-warblers (Parulidae) at a coastal site on Lake Erie, Ontario, using automated radio telemetry (black-throated blue warblers Setophaga caerulescens and magnolia warblers Setophaga magnolia) and analysis of plasma metabolites as indicators of refueling (magnolia warblers, American redstarts Setophaga ruticilla, and common yellowthroats Geothylpis trichas). We found no differences between sexes in stopover duration or refueling index, although we did find subtle sex differences in the onset and end of diel activity. Males of both species began to forage earlier in the morning than females in 2015, and adult males of both species ended diel activity later in the evening than adult females in 2014 and 2015. More obvious were annual differences in stopover duration and the timing of diel activity, with shorter stopovers and an earlier onset of diel activity in the year with a warmer spring. We also did not find any evidence that sexes differed in their postdeparture ground speeds or migration routes. In wood-warblers, males and females can differ in some aspects of their stopover ecology, but these differences are likely context dependent and likely do not drive protandry in a consistent way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available