Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rachel Bruce et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2016)
Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study
Anisa Rowhani-Farid et al.
BMJ OPEN (2016)
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013)
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
Vincent Lariviere et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
How should medical science change?
Sabine Kleinert et al.
LANCET (2014)
The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
R. Chris Fraley et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research
Anne-Sophie Jannot et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Hardly worth the effort? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study
Elizabeth Wager et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
Ferric C. Fang et al.
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY (2011)
Share Paper
