4.8 Article

Selective Separation and Preconcentration of Scandium with Mesoporous Silica

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 448-457

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b13336

Keywords

mesoporous silica; scandium; separation; preconcentration; solid-phase extraction; acid pH extraction

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC [STPGP 463032-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Separation and preconcentration of scandium (Sc) were successfully achieved using a mesoporous silica support that showed good selectivity for this element. Unmodified mesoporous silica materials were used as an extracting medium in a solid-liquid extraction (SLE) process. Selectivity, extraction capacity, kinetics of extraction, and reusability under acidic conditions were investigated. The results demonstrate the potential of unmodified mesoporous silica materials for the selective separation and preconcentration of Sc. As no chelating ligand was grafted on the silica surface, which is often the case for most solid-phase extraction media for metal-ion separation, the experimental data allow us to hypothesize that the accessible silanols on the material surface are responsible for the selective Sc extraction. This interesting feature would drastically decrease the cost of solid-liquid extraction systems by using unmodified mesoporous silica materials. Moreover, a leachate solution obtained from a real rare-earth element ore was used to determine the performances of the proposed materials in a packed column configuration. The maximum Sc adsorption on the silica material surfaces is moderate (1 mg/g), but it is balanced by a great concentration factor (more than 100 times). The extraction performances are potentially promising, both in terms of selectivity and preconcentration, under the acidic conditions tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available