4.2 Article

Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 29-53

Publisher

WHITE HORSE PRESS
DOI: 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513

Keywords

Ecosystem services; incommensurability; monetary and non-monetary valuation; value pluralism

Funding

  1. 7th Framework Program of the European Commission [308428]
  2. Colombian Administrative Department of Science, Technology and InnovationColciencias [529-2011]
  3. Research Council of Norway through the project 'Tailoring the ecosystem services approach to landscape level management' (TESL)
  4. Research Council of Norway through the project 'Integrating value diversity in the assessment of urban ecosystem services to inform nature-based solutions in cities' (SIS-URBAN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers working in the field of ecosystem services (ES) have long acknowledged the importance of recognising multiple values in ecosystems and biodiversity. Yet the operationalisation of value pluralism in ES assessments remains largely elusive. The aim of this research is to present a taxonomy of values and valuation methods to widen the evaluative space for ES. First, we present our preanalytic positions in regards to the values and valuation of ES. Second, we review different value definitions that we deem relevant for the discussion of ES valuation. Third, we propose a taxonomy of ES values based on different conceptions of human-nature relationships. Finally, we present a taxonomy of different methods that can be used to recognise plural values in ES. This taxonomy for a plural valuation can help ES scientists and practitioners with their aim of representing people's multiple and context-specific ways of valuing nature. The taxonomy can also serve to pay broader attention to ES values that are overlooked or misrepresented in assessments that restrict their focus to monetary valuations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available