3.8 Review

What we know and what we think we know about microplastic effects - A critical perspective

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.09.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Joint Programming Initiative Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans (JPI-Oceans) WEATHERMIC project, Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS) [9422015-1866]
  2. FORMAS project
  3. ir-PLAST [2015-932]
  4. Swedish Innovation Agency VINNOVA [2017-00979]
  5. Vinnova [2017-00979] Funding Source: Vinnova
  6. Formas [2017-00979] Funding Source: Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microplastic pollution is currently perceived as an environmental hazard, and adverse effects have been reported at various levels of biological organization. However, most experimental designs do not allow plastic-specific effects to be distinguished from those caused by other particles, such as clay and cellulose, which are naturally ubiquitous in the environment. We suggest that microplastic effects reported in recent ecotoxicological studies are similar to those induced by the natural particles. To provide a sound basis for risk assessment, experimental designs must not only be able to disentangle the effects of food limitation and particle toxicity but also demonstrate whether microplastics cause impacts that differ from those induced by natural particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available