4.6 Article

Local IL-25 contributes to Th2-biased inflammatory profiles in nasal polyps

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 459-469

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.13267

Keywords

chronic rhinosinusitis; interleukin 25; nasal polyps; Th2 response

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470673, 81470675, 81670908, 81500768]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2016A020215030, 2016A020215049, 2017A020215180]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2014A030310392, 2014A030313101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: IL-25 has been proposed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study aimed to evaluate the association of IL-25 with the Th2-biased inflammatory profiles in CRSwNP. Methods: Nasal polyp (NP) tissues and control uncinate process tissues were collected from 92 patients with CRSwNP, 20 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and 16 normal control subjects. IL-25 expression was examined using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining, flow cytometry, RT-qPCR, and ELISA. The inflammatory profiles and clinical characteristics of 2 NP subtypes (IL-25(high) and IL-25(low)) were evaluated, and the effects of IL-25 on Th2 cytokine production in cultured dispersed polyp cells were examined invitro. Results: The mRNA and protein levels of IL-25 were significantly increased in the polyp tissues compared with the control uncinate process tissues. The IL-25(high) subtype showed greater computed tomography scores, endoscopic scores, and Th2 response. Exposure to IL-25 activated type 2 innate lymphoid cells and Th2 cells in NP simultaneously which further increased Th2 cytokine production invitro. Conclusions: Local IL-25 plays a crucial role in promoting Th2-biased inflammatory profiles in NP and may serve as a promising therapeutic target in CRSwNP patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available