4.8 Article

PAH Exposure in Gulf of Mexico Demersal Fishes, Post-Deepwater Horizon

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 14, Pages 8786-8795

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01870

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BP/The Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative, through its Center for Integrated Modeling and Analysis of Gulf Ecosystems (C-IMAGE)
  2. State of Louisiana
  3. NOAA [NA11NMF4720151]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) blowout, we surveyed offshore demersal fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico (GoM) in 2011-2013, to assess polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAR) exposure. Biliary PAH metabolites were estimated in 271 samples of golden tilefish (Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps), king snake eel (Ophichthus rex), and red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Mean concentration of naphthalene metabolites in golden tilefish (240 mu g g(-1)) was significantly higher (p = 0.001) than in red snapper (61 mu g g(-1) or king snake eel (38 mu g g(-1)). Biliary naphthalene metabolite concentration decreased over the study period in red snapper (58%) and king snake eel (37%), indicating likely episodic exposure, while concentrations were persistently high in golden tilefish. Naphthalene metabolite levels measured in golden tilefish are among the highest concentrations measured in fishes globally, while concentrations for red snapper and king snake eel are similar to pre-DWH levels measured in GoM species. In contrast, concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene metabolites were similar for all three species (p = 0.265, mean 220 ng g(-1)) and relatively low when compared to GoM, global data and previous oil spills. These data support precious findings that fish life history and physiology play significant roles in exposure and uptake of PAH pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available