4.8 Article

Bulk Energy Storage Increases United States Electricity System Emissions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 3203-3210

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es505027p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1436469]
  2. center for Climate and Energy Decision Making (CEDM) [SES-0949710]
  3. Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center (CEIC)
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1436469] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1463492, 0949710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bulk energy storage is generally considered an important contributor for the transition toward a more flexible and sustainable electricity system. Although economically valuable, storage is not fundamentally a green technology, leading to reductions in emissions. We model the economic and emissions effects of bulk energy storage providing an energy arbitrage service. We calculate the profits under two scenarios (perfect and imperfect information about future electricity prices), and estimate the effect of bulk storage on net emissions of CO2, SO2, and NOx for 20 eGRID subregions in the United States. We find that net system CO2 emissions resulting from storage operation are nontrivial when compared to the emissions from electricity generation, ranging from 104 to 407 kg/MWh of delivered energy depending on location, storage operation mode, and assumptions regarding carbon intensity. Net NOx emissions range from -0.16 (i.e., producing net savings) to 0.49 kg/MWh, and are generally small when compared to average generation-related emissions. Net SO2 emissions from storage operation range from -0.01 to 1.7 kg/MWh, depending on location and storage operation mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available