4.0 Article

Conflicting science requirements impact on rare moss conservation measures

Journal

ANTARCTIC SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 13-21

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954102017000360

Keywords

bryophyte; conflict of values; human impact; Maritime Antarctica; single-island endemic; threatened species

Funding

  1. Spanish National Polar Programme [MIDAH CTM2010-11013]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CGL2014-56416-P]
  3. NERC [bas010011] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Antarctic Treaty recognizes the outstanding scientific values of the Antarctic environment through the designation of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) that have rigorous management plans specific to each site. Deception Island has the largest concentration of rare bryophyte species and communities in Antarctica, while also offering substantial opportunities for research in a range of scientific disciplines due to its volcanic nature. As a result, conflicts between research interests and conservation goals may arise. On the summit ridge of Caliente Hill severe trampling damage to the moss assemblages growing in association with localized geothermal activity was observed. The range of species affected included the entire known population of Schistidium deceptionense, an endemic moss known only from this site, as well as other very rare Antarctic mosses (Ditrichum ditrichoideum, Bryum orbiculatifolium, Bucklandiella subcrispipila, Pohlia wahlenbergii and Dicranella hookeri). A photomapping study was undertaken to characterize further the status of the site and monitor changes within it. Increased awareness, co-ordination of activities and a spatial zoning within the site could help mitigate damage from permitted activities. Nevertheless, prioritization of longer term conservation goals over short-term research interests may ultimately be necessary where local human impact cannot be managed by other means.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available