4.6 Article

Enhanced liver fibrosis test using ELISA assay accurately discriminates advanced stage of liver fibrosis as determined by transient elastography fibroscan in treatment na⟨ve chronic HCV patients

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 45-50

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-017-0463-4

Keywords

Liver fibrosis; HCV; ELF; TE-FibroScan; HA; PIIINP; TIMP-1

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt Grant Basic and applied research [5380]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluation of liver fibrosis stage is crucial in the assessment of chronic HCV patients, regarding decision to start treatment and during follow-up. Our aim was to assess the validity of the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score in discrimination of advanced stage of liver fibrosis in na < ve chronic HCV patients. We prospectively evaluated liver fibrosis stage in one hundred eighty-one na < ve chronic HCV Egyptian patients by transient elastography (TE)-FibroScan. Patients were categorized into mild to moderate fibrosis (F2) group and advanced fibrosis (F3) group. The ELF score components, hyaluronic acid (HA), amino-terminal propeptide of type-III-procollagen (PIIINP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase type-1 (TIMP-1), were done using ELISA test. The mean values of ELF and its individual components significantly correlated with the hepatic fibrosis stage as measured by TE-FibroScan (P value 0.001). ELF cutoff value of 9.8 generated a sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 67.1%, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.76 with 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.68-0.83) for detecting advanced fibrosis (F 3). ELF panel is a good, reliable noninvasive test and showed comparable results to TE-FibroScan in detecting liver fibrosis stage in treatment na < ve chronic HCV patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available