4.8 Article

In Vitro Mammalian Mutagenicity of Complex Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Mixtures in Contaminated Soils

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 1787-1796

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es504465f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) of the Government of Canada
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Canadian Regulatory Strategy for Biotechnology
  4. EU Regional Development Funds through the Northern Sweden Soil Remediation Centre (MCN)
  5. Naturvardsverket (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency)
  6. ADME (French Environment and Energy Management Agency) via PACMAN, a SNOWMAN Network project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study employed an in vitro version of the lacZ transgenic rodent mutation assay to assess the mutagenicity of nonpolar neutral and semipolar aromatic soil fractions from 10 PAH-contaminated sites, and evaluated the assumption of dose additivity that is routinely employed to calculate the risk posed by PAH mixtures. Significant mutagenic activity was detected in all nonpolar neutral fractions, and 8 of 10 semipolar aromatic fractions (nonpolar > semipolar). Mutagenic activity of synthetic PAH mixtures that mimic the PAH content of the soils (i.e., 5-PAH or 16-PAH mix) were greater than that of the PAH-containing soil fractions, with 5-PAH mix >16-PAH-mix. Predictions of mutagenic activity, calculated as the sum of the contributions from the mutagenic mixture components, were all within 2-fold of the observed activity of the nonpolar neutral fractions, with one exception. Observed differences in mutagenic activity are likely the result of dynamic metabolic processes, involving a complex interplay of AhR agonsim and saturation of metabolic machinery by competitive inhibition of mixture components. The presence of hitherto unidentified polar compounds present in PAH-contaminated soils may also contribute to overall hazard; however, these compounds are generally not included in current contaminated site risk assessment protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available