4.5 Article

Future-Proofing Blood Processing for Measurement of Circulating miRNAs in Samples from Biobanks and Prospective Clinical Trials

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 208-218

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0657

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CRUK Cambridge Centre Urology Malignancy Programme
  2. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  3. Isaac Newton Trust
  4. Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity/Children with Cancer UK
  5. Max Williamson Fund
  6. Action Medical Research [2244] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [W1058] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_EX_G0800464] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Sparks Charity [11CAM01] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [MC_EX_G0800464] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Quantifying circulating nucleic acids is an important new approach to cancer diagnosis/monitoring. Methods: We compared the suitability of serum versus plasma for measuring miRNAs using qRT-PCR and assessed how preanalytic variables that can affect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) quantification in plasma also influence miRNA levels. Results: Across 62 blood-derived specimens, plasma samples in EDTA, Streck-DNA, and Streck-RNA tubes showed significantly higher C-t values for multiple housekeeping miRNAs, compared with serum samples. For the EDTA-plasma tubes, this difference was only seen when including the high-speed centrifugation protocol used to optimize ctDNA extraction. In plasma samples derived from blood stored at room temperature for up to 14 days (conditions that typically apply to samples processed for biobanking), levels of endogenous housekeeping miRNAs gradually increased, in parallel with the hemolysis marker hsa-miR-451a, consistent with release from blood cells/platelets. It was necessary to normalize levels of the housekeeping miRNAs to those of hsa-miR-451a, to obtain the stable values needed for referencing test miRNA levels. Conclusions: Our data indicate that plasma samples prepared for ctDNA extraction are suboptimal for miRNA quantification and require the incorporation of multiple data normalization steps. For prospective studies designed to measure both miRNAs and ctDNA, the most suitable approach would be to obtain both serum (for miRNAs) and plasma (for ctDNA). If only plasma can be collected, we recommend an initial low-speed centrifugation step, followed by aliquoting the supernatant into parallel samples, one for direct miRNA quantification, and the other for a further high-speed centrifugation step to optimize ctDNA retrieval. Impact: These recommendations will help future-proof clinical studies in which quantification of circulating miRNAs is a component. (C) 2017 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available