4.8 Article

Novel Sample Preparation Technique To Improve Spectromicroscopic Analyses of Micrometer-Sized Particles

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 16, Pages 9874-9880

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01636

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Distributed Infrastructure for Experimentation in Ecosystem Research (EXPEER) [FP7-262060]
  2. German Research Foundation within the priority program 1315 Biogeochemical Interfaces in Soils [DFG KO1035/33-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microscale processes occurring at biogeochemical interfaces in soils and sediments have fundamental impacts on phenomena at larger scales. To obtain the organo-mineral associations necessary for the study of biogeochemical interfaces, bulk samples are usually fractionated into microaggregates or micrometer-sized single particles. Such fine-grained mineral particles are often prepared for nanoscale secondary ion mass spectroscopy (NanoSIMS) investigations by depositing them on a carrier. This introduces topographic differences, which can strongly affect local sputtering efficiencies. Embedding in resin causes undesired C impurities. We present a novel method for preparing polished cross-sections of micrometer-sized primary soil particles that overcomes the problems of topography and C contamination. The particles are coated with a marker layer, embedded, and well-polished. The interpretation of NanoSIMS data is assisted by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy on crosssections prepared by a focused ion beam. In the cross-sections, organic assemblages on the primary soil particles become visible. This novel method significantly improves the quality of NanoSIMS measurements on grainy mineral samples, enabling better characterization of soil biogeochemical interfaces. In addition, this sample preparation technique may also improve results from other (spectro-) microscopic techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available