4.8 Article

Surface Roughness Impacts on Granular Media Filtration at Favorable Deposition Conditions: Experiments and Modeling

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 13, Pages 7879-7888

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01998

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Water Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Column tests were conducted to investigate media roughness impacts on particle deposition in absence of an energy barrier (i.e., high ionic strength). Media/collector surface roughness consistently influenced colloid deposition in a nonlinear, nonmonotonic manner such that a critical roughness size associated with minimum particle deposition could be identified; this was confirmed using a convection-diffusion model. The results demonstrate that media surface roughness size alone is inadequate for predicting media roughness impacts on particle deposition; rather, the relative size relationship between the particles and media/collectors must also be considered. A model that quantitatively considers media surface roughness was developed that described experimental outcomes well and consistently with classic colloid filtration theory (CET) for smooth surfaces. Dimensionless-scaling factors f(roughness) and f(PCIF) were introduced and used to develop a model describing particle deposition, rate (k(d)) and colloid attachment efficiency (alpha). The model includes fitting parameters that reflect the impact of critical system characteristics such as ionic strength, loading rate, hydrophobicity. Excellent agreement was found not only between the modeled outcomes for colloid attachment efficiency (alpha) and experimental results from the column tests, but also with experimental outcomes reported elsewhere. The model developed herein provides a framework for describing media surface roughness impacts on colloid deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available